World leaders back ocean treaty and new marine reserves, but critics say action still lags

The United Nations Ocean Summit in France ended with pledges to ratify a treaty protecting international waters, but world leaders faced pushback for slow progress and weak commitments on key issues like bottom trawling and deep-sea mining.

Karen McVeigh reports for The Guardian.

In short:

Sixty heads of state and 190 ministers met in Nice for the UN ocean summit, where France announced that the high seas treaty is expected to take effect by January 2026.
Four new nations joined calls for a ban or moratorium on deep-sea mining, while 90 ministers supported a strong global plastics treaty ahead of negotiations in August.
Critics, including Pacific island leaders and ocean advocates, said rich nations, especially France, fell short in addressing destructive fishing practices like bottom trawling.

Key quote:

“President Macron promised action on bottom trawling in marine protected areas but delivered only artificial limits and empty words.”

— Alexandra Cousteau, adviser to Oceana and granddaughter of Jacques Cousteau

Why this matters:

Oceans are central to life on Earth, producing over half the oxygen we breathe and absorbing much of the planet’s carbon dioxide. But decades of industrial overfishing, pollution, warming, and climate-driven acidification have pushed marine ecosystems toward collapse. Bottom trawling, a fishing method that scrapes the ocean floor, destroys habitats vital to biodiversity and carbon storage. Deep-sea mining threatens to scar untouched seafloors before their ecological value is even understood. While marine protected areas and international treaties offer hope, only a fraction of the ocean is currently safeguarded. Without enforceable limits and meaningful investment, rhetoric at high-level summits risks becoming a substitute for action, leaving frontline nations and future generations to bear the cost of marine decline.

www.theguardian.com

World leaders back ocean treaty and new marine reserves, but critics say action still lags

What top climate scientists think of Trump’s treaty withdrawals

As Trump eyes Greenland, what could that mean for island’s mineral wealth and environment?

The impact of US withdrawal from global climate pacts

US exit of key UN climate treaty criticized as self-sabotage

US oil companies will be slow to answer Trump’s call to tap into Venezuela, experts say

‘Profound impacts’: Record ocean heat is intensifying climate disasters, data shows

Opinion: Climate misinformation threatens Canada’s national security

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.