Wyoming weighs nuclear waste storage rule change amid public pushback over microreactor plant

Lawmakers in Wyoming are debating a bill that would allow storage of radioactive waste from a proposed microreactor manufacturing facility, a move that has drawn sharp resistance from local residents.

Dustin Bleizeffer reports for WyoFile.

In short:

The bill would exempt advanced nuclear reactor manufacturers from Wyoming’s long-standing ban on nuclear fuel waste storage, paving the way for Radiant Industries’ planned facility near the town of Bar Nunn.
Residents packed a town hall to oppose on-site waste storage, citing proximity to homes and schools, while some leaders, including the town’s mayor, defended their support for the project against rumors of corruption.
Supporters see potential to revive uranium mining and create jobs, while critics warn it could make Wyoming a de facto repository for nuclear waste from around the world.

Key quote:

“Bar Nunn does not want nuclear waste. We want manufacturing. We would love for Radiant to come here and manufacture and put the waste somewhere else.”

— Wyoming State Rep. Bill Allemand

Why this matters:

Nuclear waste storage has long been one of the most divisive questions in U.S. energy policy. Spent fuel remains radioactive for thousands of years, and no permanent federal repository exists despite decades of debate. Temporary storage sites like the one proposed in Wyoming often face fears that “temporary” will become permanent. Communities near proposed facilities worry about accidents, transportation risks, and the stigma attached to living near radioactive material, even as advocates tout nuclear power’s low carbon footprint and promise of steady jobs. The Wyoming fight reflects a national tension between the need for cleaner energy and the unresolved legacy of nuclear waste.

wyofile.com

Aerial view of Rosendale Dairy, a CAFO (concentrated animal feeding operation) in Rosendale, Wisconsin.

Credit: Amelia Bates/Unsplash

Colorado CAFOs linked to ammonia air pollution hotspots

Levels of airborne ammonia, which can harm people’s ability to breathe, are increasing three times faster each year in Colorado’s Front Range where there are clusters of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) compared to nearby urban areas without the massive livestock farms, according to a new study.

Read the Full Article on

www.thenewlede.org

Wyoming weighs nuclear waste storage rule change amid public pushback over microreactor plant

Opinion: Why Trump’s $2 billion buyoff to cancel offshore wind farms is a bad deal for American taxpayers and the US energy supply

Bolivia’s fuel shortages drive a surge in electric cars

Drilling into the Thwaites Glacier in Antarctica

Why short-term wins for the Colorado River won’t avert a water crisis

Plugging away at the millions of derelict oil and gas wells in the US

As coal rebounds, more toxic mercury is in the air

Colorado CAFOs linked to ammonia air pollution hotspots

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.