Young climate lawsuit ends after a decade without Supreme Court review

The Supreme Court declined to hear Juliana v. United States, ending a 10-year legal effort by young activists who argued the federal government violated their constitutional rights by promoting fossil fuel use.

Claire Rush reports for The Associated Press.


In short:

  • Filed in 2015 by 21 plaintiffs ages 8 to 19, the case sought to hold the U.S. government accountable for its role in driving climate change.
  • Courts repeatedly blocked the case from going to trial, with final dismissal ordered by the 9th Circuit and upheld by the Supreme Court’s refusal to review.
  • Plaintiffs and their legal team at Our Children’s Trust plan new federal litigation based on similar constitutional claims.

Key quote:

“For almost ten years, we’ve stood up for the rights of present and future generations, demanding a world where we cannot only survive, but thrive.”

— Miko Vergun, plaintiff in Juliana v. United States

Why this matters:

The Juliana v. United States lawsuit was a bold attempt by 21 young Americans to force the federal government to reckon with its role in perpetuating climate change. Filed in 2015, the case argued that government policies favoring fossil fuels violated the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property. Though it was repeatedly blocked from going to trial, Juliana made an indelible mark on climate discourse, challenging the legal system to treat a livable climate as a fundamental right.

The case helped inspire a new wave of climate litigation driven by young people, particularly in states with stronger environmental protections enshrined in law. In Montana and Hawaii, youth-led lawsuits have already yielded victories, with courts affirming that state governments must consider the long-term consequences of their energy policies. As global temperatures continue to rise and emissions targets remain elusive, these legal efforts have become a symbol of generational demand for accountability and a stark reminder of how existing political systems have struggled to respond to the urgency of the climate crisis.

Related:

Battle ships heading into the sunset

Water, power, and the future of conflict

Explore the rise of water as a geopolitical weapon influencing global security, economics, and environmental stability in 2026.
A view of the Salton Sea with mountains in the background

The clean energy transition at the Salton Sea

California holds vast stores of lithium, but mining projects stir debate over environmental costs and economic benefits.

A worker at a steel plant

Indonesia’s steel expansion risks a surge in greenhouse gas emissions

Indonesia’s steel industry is becoming one of the country’s fastest-growing sources of greenhouse gas emissions, even as it receives far less public attention than other carbon-intensive sectors.

An oil pump jack in a dry field

New Mexico again debates greenhouse gas reductions as snow melts

Lawmakers table bill to expand the use of oilfield wastewater and shoot down another that would restrict drone use around “critical” infrastructure.

A gray warehouse type building on a brown field on a sunny day

Data centers are scrambling to power the AI boom with natural gas

As tech giants find creative ways to generate electricity, they’re building a glut of new fossil fuel projects.
U.S. Congressman Jim Jordan speaking at the 2015 Defending the American Dream Summit
Credit: Gage Skidmore/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/

Federal Judicial Center pulls climate change chapter from official manual for U.S. judges

The “Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence” — updated for the first time in 15 years — eliminates some 90 pages about climate science and comes just as numerous climate cases make their way through state and federal courts.
US Supreme Court roof and pillars in evening sun and shadow.

Trump EPA to take its biggest swing yet against climate change rules

With its plans to revoke the endangerment finding, the administration is gambling that the U.S. Supreme Court will allow it to completely avoid regulating the nation’s top greenhouse gas sources.

From our Newsroom
Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro speaks with the state flag and American flag behind him.

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

silhouette of people holding hands by a lake at sunset

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

wildfire retardants being sprayed by plane

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.