Zooming in on the fallout from the Trump administration's freezing of green bank funds

A sweeping halt to a $27 billion federal climate program is upending clean energy plans and stalling economic development for nonprofits, lenders, and contractors in low-income communities nationwide.

Marianne Lavelle and Dan Gearino report for Inside Climate News.

In short:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency froze the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, a signature Biden-era program designed to spur clean energy investments in disadvantaged communities through a public-private lending model.
The freeze has paused billions in loans, halted solar and energy-efficiency projects, and disrupted the work of local nonprofits and lenders who were preparing to distribute the funds.
Trump officials have launched a criminal probe and are asserting broad executive power to cancel contracts, a move now being challenged in federal court.

Key quote:

"They’re just manufacturing claims, and that manufacturing of claims is itself a fraud. It’s a fraud on the public.”

— U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.)

Why this matters:

The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund—a $27 billion program born out of the Inflation Reduction Act—was designed as a keystone of the Biden administration’s climate agenda. Its goal: seed a nationwide network of “green banks” to finance clean energy projects in low-income and pollution-burdened communities. These banks offer low-interest loans for rooftop solar, efficient heat pumps, and community solar installations, often in places where traditional lenders are scarce or wary. Now, with the program in limbo following legal challenges and a policy freeze from the Trump administration, a rare moment of bipartisan momentum is at risk of unraveling. Critics argue the freeze undermines Congressional authority and undercuts historically underserved communities just as billions were poised to flow their way.

insideclimatenews.org

Zooming in on the fallout from the Trump administration's freezing of green bank funds

Data centers for AI could nearly triple San Jose’s energy use. Who foots the bill?

Nowhere to move: How climate change became the property market’s biggest nightmare

Extreme heat hampers children’s early learning

AI data center backlash: Public opposition to new projects is growing

As NOAA funding lags, a critical ocean weather system nears a breaking point

EU to ‘push back petrol car sales ban to 2040’

Dodging icebergs and storms on the hunt for an ocean tipping point

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.