Credit: UNEP
14m
Environmental justice advocates criticize lack of inclusion in plastic treaty negotiations
“We had to fight for every second we had on the floor.”
Environmental justice and Indigenous groups say they were largely excluded from key plastic treaty talks last week in Busan, South Korea, which took place over seven days and ended without a final text.
As oil and gas producing nations opposed reducing plastic production, the fifth round of talks in a series of UN Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee meetings ended without clear consensus on how to curb global plastic pollution. The group will reconvene next year with hopes of finalizing a treaty.
During previous plastic treaty talks, environmental justice and Indigenous delegations were permitted to listen and speak during negotiations between member states. That changed at this meeting, as the last several days of the talks consisted of private conversations.
“I was really disappointed with the process this time,” Sarah Martik, director of the Center for Coalfield Justice, an environmental justice advocacy group based in western Pennsylvania, told EHN. “There were two and a half days of informal meetings with delegates from member states held in private rooms, which completely cut out civil society. We have no notes and no records from those meetings … and we had very few opportunities to speak. We had to fight for every second we had on the floor.”
“I was really disappointed with the process this time.” Sarah Martik, Center for Coalfield Justice
Other U.S.-based environmental justice advocacy groups including the The Descendants Project in Louisiana’s Cancer Alley; the Port Arthur Community Action Network in Texas; and Breathe Free Detroit expressed similar frustrations, as did numerous Indigenous groups.
“[Holding negotiations during private meetings] is a blatant attempt to stifle dissent and pave the way for the influence of the petrochemical industry,” Frankie Orona, executive director of Society of Native Nations, said in a statement. “Despite our tireless advocacy and the support of numerous member states, the [latest treaty draft] fails to recognize our inherent rights and traditional knowledge, effectively silencing our voices in the fight against plastic pollution.”
The groups also said that oil and gas-producing countries “weaponized” the consensus-based decision-making process by intentionally stalling progress during the negotiations and effectively vetoing measures favored by a majority of other countries, like plastic production caps.
“Despite our tireless advocacy and the support of numerous member states, the [latest treaty draft] fails to recognize our inherent rights and traditional knowledge." - Frankie Orona, Society of Native Nations
China, the United States, India, South Korea and Saudi Arabia were the top five primary plastic-producing nations in 2023, according to data provider Eunomia. Some of these countries, like Saudi Arabia, Russia and India, oppose production caps. More than 100 of the approximately 170 countries attending the talks supported caps on plastic production. The U.S. and China were absent from the talks when countries pressed for production limits.
“Saudi Arabia and Russia kept taking the floor to be obstructionist, basically saying a whole lot of nothing, and we didn’t get an opportunity to speak on the floor until about two in the morning, when a lot of member states were already leaving,” Martik said.
“The elephant in the room is how the U.S. presidential election is going to impact all of this,” Martik added. “Delaying the final treaty until after Trump takes office could change how the U.S. is showing up at these negotiations.”
Keep reading...Show less
Read the Full Article on
www.ehn.org
Senator Whitehouse puts climate change on budget committee’s agenda
For more than a decade, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse gave daily warnings about the mounting threat of climate change. Now he has a powerful new perch.
Credit: Getty Images/Unsplash+
05 December
How the plastic industry undermines democracy by blocking bans
On a cool, sunny day in March 2020, Ted Harris towed a large net from a boat in Clinton Lake in Kansas and retrieved a sample of microscopic debris in the water.
Harris, an associate research professor at the University of Kansas, was participating in a global study, published in 2023, that looked for microplastics in lakes all over the world.
Tiny plastic particles with a diameter less than 5 millimeters (nanoplastics are much smaller, ranging from 1 to 1,000 nanometers), these particles are harmful to tiny organisms in lakes like zooplankton, that mistake them for food. Larger animals like fish eat the zooplankton, causing the plastic particles to accumulate up the food chain. People can be exposed by eating fish from these lakes. Once in our bodies, they cannot be digested or broken down. “They either get passed through us or they get stuck somewhere inside,” Harris said.
Scientists found microplastics in every lake tested, including Clinton Lake, which is near Lawrence, Kansas and is a popular spot for party boats, swimming and fishing.
Keep reading...Show less
Read the Full Article on
www.ehn.org
Credit: Vadzim Kushniarou/Big Stock Photo
05 December
Oil and gas profits could fund global climate efforts, study suggests
A new study argues that taxing excess oil and gas profits could provide billions of dollars in climate financing, easing the financial burden on developing countries.
In short:
- Oil and gas companies earned $495 billion in unexpected profits in 2022 due to energy price spikes from the Russia-Ukraine war.
- A 30% tax on these profits could have raised $147 billion, while a 100% tax could have generated $324 billion.
- The study suggests using these profits to meet the climate finance needs of developing countries, which currently fall far short of the $1.3 trillion experts estimate is necessary.
Key quote:
“The sheer magnitude of these numbers illustrates that there is ample potential for governments to raise funds for climate action.”
— Study published in Climate Policy
Why this matters:
Redirecting these profits could help mitigate climate impacts, but it requires global political will and cooperation.
Read more: Lawmakers target fossil fuel companies to fund climate disaster recovery
Keep reading...Show less
Read the Full Article on
news.mongabay.com
Credit: Sungrow EMEA/Unsplash
05 December
GOP agenda may alter tax incentives for clean energy
A second Trump administration might curtail tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act, threatening clean energy investments and job growth in the U.S.
In short:
- The GOP plans to extend corporate tax cuts from the first Trump administration, potentially offsetting costs by limiting Inflation Reduction Act tax credits.
- Tax credits for bipartisan-supported industries like nuclear energy may remain, but those for electric vehicles and offshore wind face challenges.
- Accelerating deadlines for clean energy tax credits could increase costs and disrupt project development, especially for solar and wind energy.
Key quote:
“Even if you don’t think a sledgehammer is coming in terms of policy, it’s been a sledgehammer for the stocks because of the uncertainty we’re facing.”
— Joe Osha, senior managing director, Guggenheim Partners
Why this matters:
Cutting or altering tax credits for clean energy could slow the U.S. transition to a low-carbon economy and weaken its global competitiveness. Changes could also undermine significant investments in clean technology manufacturing, affecting jobs in regions that supported the Trump campaign.
Read more: Upper-income households capture most Biden energy tax credits
Keep reading...Show less
Read the Full Article on
www.canarymedia.com
Credit: Faux Toe/Big Stock Photo
05 December
Trump energy nominee faces backlash for misrepresents climate studies
Chris Wright, Donald Trump’s Energy Department nominee, claims scientific research supports his view that there is no climate crisis, but the authors of the studies he cites say he misrepresents their findings.
Evan Halper and Peter Whoriskey report for The Washington Post.
In short:
- Chris Wright, CEO of Liberty Energy and nominee for energy secretary, argues climate risks are overstated, citing studies he claims support his position.
- Scientists behind those studies assert Wright cherry-picks and distorts their findings, misattributing reductions in cold-related deaths and minimizing climate change's impacts.
- Wright’s stance, aligned with fossil fuel advocacy, raises concerns about how he might shape U.S. energy policy under Trump.
Key quote:
“What he is saying is flat out wrong.”
— Jim Kossin, climate scientist and IPCC report author
Why this matters:
Wright's leadership in the Energy Department could reverse progress on clean energy and environmental protections. Misrepresentation of scientific research undermines efforts to address climate change, potentially endangering public health and global sustainability.
Read more about Chris Wright: Trump’s energy pick pushes fossil fuels as climate savior in private
Keep reading...Show less
Read the Full Article on
www.washingtonpost.com
Credit: badboo/Big Stock Photo
05 December
Kristi Noem's handling of South Dakota flood raises doubts about FEMA readiness
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem’s response to catastrophic June floods has left residents questioning her ability to manage disasters as she is nominated to lead Homeland Security.
Peter Jamison and Isaac Stanley-Becker report for The Washington Post.
In short:
- Residents of McCook Lake in North Sioux City, S.D., criticize Noem’s disaster response, citing delayed evacuation orders and lack of National Guard support during June floods.
- Noem waited over a month to request federal disaster aid, leaving victims without assistance while nearby Iowa mobilized resources and received aid quickly.
- Critics question Noem’s priorities, noting her focus on political events while disaster-stricken communities relied on private donations and local volunteers.
Key quote:
“I feel foolish for thinking that my government would take care of me in an emergency. Where are her priorities, and who is she looking out for? Because it’s definitely not me. It’s definitely not my neighborhood.”
— Kathy Roberts, North Sioux City resident
Why this matters:
Effective disaster management saves lives and supports recovery, especially as climate change drives more frequent and severe weather events. Noem’s handling of the floods raises concerns about her capacity to lead FEMA during national crises.
Related: Trump nominates Kristi Noem for Homeland Security role, raising climate concerns
Keep reading...Show less
Read the Full Article on
www.washingtonpost.com
Credit: Annie Spratt/Unsplash
05 December
EU delays deforestation law enforcement
The European Union will postpone enforcing its anti-deforestation law by one year, citing readiness concerns, but the law's strict requirements remain unchanged.
In short:
- The EU Deforestation Regulation, designed to ensure supply chains do not contribute to global deforestation, now takes effect at the end of 2025.
- The delay stems from incomplete digital tools and inadequate preparation among some EU nations, potentially resulting in significant forest loss during the postponement.
- Many businesses and cocoa-producing countries like Ghana and Ivory Coast have already adapted to comply, urging against further delays.
Key quote:
“ ... we cannot afford delays to much-needed environmental protection laws like the EU's anti-deforestation legislation.”
— Giulia Bondi, campaigner with international investigative nonprofit Global Witness
Why this matters:
Deforestation drives climate change and biodiversity loss. Delaying action could mean thousands of square kilometers of additional forest loss, undermining efforts to combat global environmental crises. Policymakers must balance preparation time with the urgent need for enforcement.
Keep reading...Show less
Read the Full Article on
www.dw.com
From our Newsroom
What a Trump administration means for the federal hydrogen energy push
Legal and industry experts say there are uncertainties about the future of hydrogen hubs, a cornerstone of the Biden administration’s clean energy push.
Op-ed: The common ground between labor and climate justice is the key to a livable future
The tale of “jobs versus the environment” does not capture the full story.
El terreno común entre los derechos laborales y la justicia climática es la clave de un futuro habitable
La narrativa de “empleos vs. proteger el medio ambiente” no cuenta la historia completa.
LISTEN: Pradnya Garud on the role of unions in climate justice
“They’ve been able to combine forces and really come forward to bring social and environmental change.”
Hydrogen hubs test new federal environmental justice rules
A massive push for hydrogen energy is one of the first test cases of new federal environmental justice initiatives. Communities and advocates so far give the feds a failing grade.
What’s hampering federal environmental justice efforts in the hydrogen hub build-out?
“Organizational change in large bureaucracies takes time.”