A graphic image of a brain with arms and legs walking out of a city pulling a suitcase.

Europe steps up funding to attract U.S. scientists facing cuts under Trump

As the Trump administration reduces research funding and tightens restrictions on universities, European leaders are offering financial incentives to lure American scientists.

Catherine Porter and Roger Cohen report for The New York Times.

In short:

French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced major investments to attract U.S.-based researchers, including a €500 million EU initiative a $113 million commitment from France.
Trump administration policies, including funding freezes and attacks on diversity and climate science, have caused concern among American academics and prompted lawsuits from major universities like Harvard.
European universities, such as Aix Marseille University, are launching programs to provide refuge for scientists affected by U.S. policy changes, while debates continue over Europe’s own research funding levels.

Key quote:

“In the United States, once a paradise for researchers, academic freedom is being challenged. The line between truth and falsehood, between fact and belief, is being weakened.”

— Elisabeth Borne, France’s education minister

Why this matters:

Scientific research thrives in environments where inquiry is open and funding is stable. As the U.S. government imposes new limits on federal support and subjects universities to ideological litmus tests, Europe is seizing the moment to position itself as a haven for researchers. This shift has profound implications not just for the careers of individual scientists but for the global scientific enterprise. Disciplines like climate science, public health, and biomedical research could see talent migration, potentially altering where and how breakthroughs occur. Furthermore, limiting scientific freedom in the U.S. may erode public trust in academic institutions and weaken responses to health and environmental challenges. Europe’s proactive stance may cushion the impact of these policies, but the long-term effects of such an academic brain drain — and the political forces driving it — remain uncertain.

www.nytimes.com

Europe steps up funding to attract U.S. scientists facing cuts under Trump

Fossil fuel advocate shapes Republican push to cut renewable energy funding

Trump administration may weaken or block first national workplace heat protections

World leaders back ocean treaty and new marine reserves, but critics say action still lags

New protections for nature must account for climate risks, scientists say

Alaska braces for rising heat as warming climate shatters old norms

Mercury contamination in Arctic wildlife may persist for generations despite global emission cuts

Trump’s funding freeze threatens Alaska village’s clean energy future

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.