17 March 2018
Scott Pruitt, Trump’s rule-cutting E.P.A. chief, plots his political future
Mr. Pruitt may be using his position as an environmental deregulation czar to position himself to run for office in Oklahoma — or perhaps the presidency.
“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”
PITTSBURGH — On Wednesday, the morning after hurricane-like weather conditions killed at least four people and caused power outages at more than 400,000 homes in southwestern Pennsylvania, community advocates and scientists held an event to discuss how President Donald Trump's first 100 days in office have set back climate action and harmed environmental health and research.
“Climate change has created numerous dangerous realities for families in Pennsylvania,” said Vanessa Lynch, an organizer with Moms Clean Air Force who spoke at the event. “Severe storms are becoming more frequent and more severe, like yesterday's storm with winds ripping out trees, tearing off roofs, and causing hundreds of thousands of people to be without power.”
The event was part of a series of actions across the country by advocates for health, human rights, and the environment dubbed “100 days, 100 harms,” intended to highlight the on-the-ground impacts of the Trump administration’s first 100 days in office.
Lynch noted that the Trump administration has announced plans to revoke a 2009 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy, based on a Supreme Court ruling, that says greenhouse gasses are a threat to public health and should be regulated under the Clean Air Act. The policy, known as the “endangerment finding,” serves as the legal basis for most federal and many state climate pollution rules for power plants, industries, and cars, and experts have warned that revoking it could have substantial public health impacts.
Vanessa Lynch, organizer with Moms Clean Air ForceCredit: Kristina Marusic for EHN
“I’ve witnessed firsthand the impacts the oil and gas industry has had on my community in western Pennsylvania, where I live with my two children and my husband,” Lynch said, adding that an oil and gas well in her neighborhood negatively impacts air quality near daycares, schools, homes, and an assisted living facility. “Revoking the endangerment finding would threaten the EPA’s ability to protect us from climate pollution at all.”
Carrie McDonough, an assistant professor of chemistry at Carnegie Mellon University who leads a research group focused on the health risks toxic chemicals pose to humans and wildlife, said the Trump administration has taken numerous actions undermining what agencies like the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the EPA can do to protect Americans from harmful chemical exposures in their everyday lives. As an example, she pointed to the firing of most of the scientists working at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the agency that regulates workplace safety, including at least 200 in Pittsburgh.
“They’re trying to use federal funding to control our universities — what scientists are allowed to work on, and who is allowed to do that work,” McDonough said, referencing new restrictions on funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world.
“They want us to erase certain words from our work like ‘indigenous,’ ‘disparity,’ and ‘environmental justice,’ because they want to erase marginalized communities who are disproportionately impacted by environmental pollution,” McDonough said. “If this continues, and if scientists at our universities and our federal labs comply, you won't be able to trust our science anymore or the information they give you because our messages will be censored and distorted.”
Carrie McDonough, assistant professor of chemistry at Carnegie Mellon UniversityCredit: Kristina Marusic for EHN
McDonough added that the Trump administration’s unlawful detention of international students across the country has “terrorized” her own international students, hampering their work.
“These are students who left their families behind — some leaving their countries for the first time for the opportunity to come and learn in the United States,” she said. “Some of my students can’t go home to visit their families because they’re afraid they won’t be able to get back into the country. They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”
Speakers from the Clean Air Council and the Environmental Health Project also shared stories about how Trump’s roll-backs of environmental policies are worsening air pollution and threatening the health of communities that are home to fracking wells and industrial facilities in western Pennsylvania.
“If this was 100 days, what will the next three years look like?” said Lois Bower-Bjornson, an organizer with the Clean Air Council. “We can’t wait to be rescued. We’re going to have to work together to prevent as much of this harm as possible — we owe that to each other.”
If Big Oil had led on climate instead of denying it, we might be living in a very different world, writes Ruxandra Guidi for High Country News.
In short:
Why this matters:
People don’t change because of facts alone — they change because someone they trust goes first. That’s why it matters when a mayor bikes to work, or a pop star ditches private jets for trains. These acts, however small, get noticed. They turn into norms. They turn into culture. And that’s where policy finds its footing.
Read more: Wealth and the climate dilemma
A global movement of visible mending is transforming the simple act of repairing clothes into a personal and environmental statement.
In short:
Key quote:
“People are becoming more aware that the way we produce is harmful to people and the environment. It’s a smaller, quieter form of activism that I think is really exciting.”
— Sam Bennett, partner with Repair Shop
Why this matters:
From city streets to living rooms, people are sitting down with worn-out jeans and torn sweaters, patching them not with shame, but with intention. Teaching people to repair instead of replace clothing offers a simple, tangible way to protect health and climate while building community in the process. But it’s also personal. Mending becomes meditation. It’s a chance to reclaim a sense of agency, connect with others, and heal in more ways than one.
Read more: I tried to sew a compostable stuffed animal for my friend’s newborn. It did not go well.
Governments worldwide will meet in Brazil this November for the Cop30 summit amid economic strain and a U.S. withdrawal from climate commitments under President Trump.
In short:
Key quote:
“But there is obviously some that say, ‘God, how am I going to convince my people that I have to try to lower emissions if the richest country in the world is not doing the same?”
— André Corrêa do Lago, president of Cop30
Why this matters:
The stakes for Cop30 are high. As global temperatures continue to rise, the gap between climate pledges and actual emissions reductions remains troublingly wide. The U.S. exit from the Paris Agreement and rollbacks on environmental policies under President Trump have not only diminished American leadership on climate issues but also emboldened other nations to delay or scale back their own commitments. Meanwhile, the ongoing divide between wealthy nations and the global South over climate finance threatens to stall progress just when urgency is most needed.
Read more: Pacific island nations demand faster climate action from wealthy countries ahead of Cop30
The U.S. House of Representatives voted Wednesday to overturn California’s clean truck standards aimed at reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, despite objections from Congress’ own legal watchdog.
In short:
Key quote:
"The unprecedented nature of ignoring the GAO … is profound."
— Rachel Weintraub, executive director of the Coalition for Sensible Safeguards
Why this matters:
California has long held a unique role in shaping U.S. vehicle emissions policy due to its severe air quality challenges and the Clean Air Act’s waiver system. By setting tougher standards, California not only addresses local pollution but also influences national market trends as other states often adopt its rules. The House’s move to override these standards, against the advice of the GAO, raises questions about the future of state-led environmental innovation amid growing concerns about climate change and public health. If the Senate follows suit and legal challenges arise, the outcome could reshape federal-state power balances on pollution control, potentially slowing the nation’s transition to cleaner transportation options.
Read more: California backs off electric truck mandate but offers incentives
In a historic rollback of Clean Air Act protections, the U.S. Senate voted to let polluters off the hook for controlling the most dangerous air pollutants, with the House of Representatives and President Trump expected to follow suit.
In short:
Key quote:
“Repealing this rule would be such a giveaway to corporate polluters. These facilities could increase their toxic pollution without any accountability or oversight.”
— Nathan Park, an associate legislative representative at Earthjustice
Why this matters:
Proponents of overturning the rule say it is burdensome to business. But the action would weaken protections for low-income communities and communities of color living near industrial plants — places that are often already burdened by high cancer rates and toxic exposure. Taking action to scale back Clean Air Act protections is a first for Congress, and a victory for the fossil fuel and petrochemical industries that had lobbied to overturn the regulation.
Read more from EHN:
Federal buyouts and retirements are depleting U.S. agencies of experienced staff in energy, environment, and public health, raising concerns about long-term policy capacity.
Hannah Northey, Heather Richards, and Sean Reilly report for E&E News.
In short:
Key quote:
“You can’t understate the expertise and institutional knowledge we’re losing.”
— Career staffer, Department of Energy
Why this matters:
The departure of thousands of seasoned federal employees from agencies overseeing energy, environment, and public health could have wide-ranging effects on national policy and public safety. Federal staff reductions often mean that critical institutional knowledge walks out the door, leaving behind gaps that can’t easily be filled. In agencies like the EPA and DOE, this knowledge is essential for managing complex tasks such as protecting water and air quality, overseeing hazardous waste, and supporting the transition to renewable energy. The loss also affects wildfire mitigation, national park operations, and endangered species protection. Without experienced personnel, new regulatory actions risk delays, legal challenges, and errors that could have lasting environmental and health consequences. Moreover, the exodus hampers the recruitment and mentoring of younger professionals, potentially stalling future innovation and leadership.
Read more: Editorial: Public health protections unravel as U.S. science agencies face political cuts
"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”
A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations
“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”
“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.
We must prioritize minority-serving institutions, BIPOC-led organizations and researchers to lead environmental justice efforts.
Responses to the new rules have been mixed, and environmental advocates worry that Trump could undermine them.