air pollution
EPA struggles to deliver environmental justice in overpolluted communities
The Biden administration's Justice40 Initiative aimed to address environmental injustice by prioritizing investments in overburdened communities, but residents in southern hotspots like Jackson, Mississippi and Louisiana's Cancer Alley are still waiting for meaningful change.
In short:
- Biden’s Justice40 Initiative sought to direct 40% of federal climate and clean energy investments to marginalized communities, but progress has been slow.
- EPA Administrator Michael Regan toured polluted southern towns in 2021, promising stronger enforcement and funding, but industrial pollution and systemic barriers remain entrenched.
- Critics argue the EPA’s efforts, including air monitoring and funding allocations, fall short of addressing the root causes of pollution and community health crises.
Key quote:
“EPA is just trying to pacify us. They’ve done nothing but ignore the community folk and what they want. We want true change.”
— Debra Sullivan Ramirez, Mossville resident
Why this matters:
Polluted communities, often home to low-income and minority populations, face severe health risks and environmental degradation due to decades of industrial activity. Without systemic reforms and stronger enforcement, pollution hotspots will continue to suffer, leaving residents without clean air, water or trust in regulatory efforts.
Read more:
Albuquerque doubles down on cycling safety to curb traffic dangers
Bicycle commuters in Albuquerque face persistent risks from vehicle collisions, but city initiatives aim to make roads safer, reduce emissions and encourage sustainable transportation.
In short:
- Albuquerque, one of the most dangerous U.S. cities for cyclists, has launched infrastructure projects like buffered bike lanes and multi-use trails to protect riders and reduce traffic deaths.
- Despite improvements, disparities remain in bike infrastructure between wealthier and low-income neighborhoods, with inconsistent enforcement allowing cars to misuse bike lanes.
- Cities like Tucson and Denver provide examples of effective cycling safety measures, from bike-specific traffic signals to robust physical barriers, inspiring Albuquerque’s future plans.
Key quote:
“Sometimes there’s bike lanes and there’s varying levels of quality in those bike lanes. And then often cyclists are forced to be just out in the same lane [with motor vehicles].”
— Eric Biedermann, board member at large for BikeABQ
Why this matters:
Albuquerque is trying to prove that safer streets aren’t just about avoiding crashes — they’re about cleaner air, less sprawl and healthier communities. But will the momentum stick, or will bike lanes remain a patchwork solution?
Read more: Bicycling is having a moment—let’s use it to make riding more safe and inclusive.
Closing coal plants in environmental justice communities first would save more lives: Study
“This study offers a model for balancing environmental, economic and social goals.”
PITTSBURGH — As coal-fired power plants shut down in favor of cleaner, cheaper energy sources, prioritizing the shut-down of the plants in vulnerable communities could yield greater public health benefits and save additional lives, according to a new study.
The study, published in Environmental Science & Technology, suggests that decreases in emissions from prioritizing environmental justice while phasing out Pennsylvania’s coal power plants could eventually prevent up to 136 premature deaths caused by air pollution across Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Washington, D.C., which are served by the same regional power generation network.
“This study offers a model for balancing environmental, economic and social goals, shaping a healthier future for vulnerable communities,” Emily Pakhtigian, an assistant professor of public policy at Penn State and a co-lead author on the study, said in a statement.
Coal-fired power plants emit many health-harming pollutants, including carbon and sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and heavy metals, which are linked to cancer, respiratory and cardiovascular disease among other health problems.
The U.S. is on track to close about half of its coal-fired power plants by 2026, according to the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. In 2023, renewables provided more than 20% of the electricity in the U.S. and only around 220 coal power plants are still operating across the country, marking a decline of more than half since 2013.
These trends are mirrored in Pennsylvania, so researchers at Princeton and Penn State Universities and the University of Michigan used advanced computer modeling to evaluate six different scenarios for gradually phasing out coal production in the state, either by reducing capacity or generation, at the six coal-fired plants that were still operating in Pennsylvania as of 2019 (three of which remain open).
These scenarios evaluated how the state’s energy production could transition away from coal based on cost, climate priorities or environmental justice priorities. The study found that among the scenarios that reduced generation at coal power plants, prioritizing plants near Pennsylvania’s environmental justice communities yielded the largest public health benefits, resulting in up to 13% fewer deaths caused by air pollution in the state and 4% fewer deaths in the rest of the regional power generation network.
“By prioritizing coal plant retirements based on health and equity impacts, Pennsylvania could take significant strides toward cleaner air and more just energy policies,” said Pakhtigian in a statement.
The researchers assessed various scenarios for retiring coal-fired power plants based on different priorities.Image is from the study, "Designing Retirement Strategies for Coal-Fired Power Plants To Mitigate Air Pollution and Health Impacts"
Closing large coal plants can reshape power generation across the regional power system, which the research also accounted for.
“The beauty of our interdisciplinary approach is that it uses complex, coupled modeling methods to account for the entire chain of adjustments,” Joel Landry, an environmental and energy economist at Penn State and one of the study’s co-authors, said in a statement. “It captures not only the public health impacts within Pennsylvania, but also on other communities within the same regional power systems, such as those located near generation assets that may have to operate more to fill the demand gap caused by retiring Pennsyalvania’s coal plants.”
Only three coal-fired power plants remain operational in Pennsylvania today: The Keystone and Conemaugh generating stations, both of which are in western Pennsylvania and are expected to close by the end of 2028, and Talen Energy’s Montour station in central Pennsylvania, which is expected to convert to natural gas by the end of 2025.
In 2019, former Pennsylvania governor Tom Wolf signed an executive order to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a multi-state program that aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, in large part by speeding the retirement of coal-fired plants. The program was expected to create substantial public health benefits, including the prevention of between 282 and 639 premature deaths in Pennsylvania by 2030. But in 2023, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ruled in favor of state Republicans and industry groups’ lawsuits against the initiative, halting it. Gov. Josh Shapiro's administration subsequently filed an appeal to that ruling in the state Supreme Court, which could take several years to rule on the case.
The authors of the recent study said they hope policymakers across the country will consider their findings when planning clean energy transitions in order to maximize public health benefits.
“Policies could provide enhanced incentives for new clean energy capacity that would displace electricity from coal-fired facilities with the largest health impacts,” Hannah Wiseman, a professor of law at Penn State and co-author of the study, said in a statement. “Regional transmission organizations, in particular, which govern the interconnection of new clean energy generation, should take these factors into account.”
Trump’s EPA pick faces Senate grilling over climate rollback plans
Lee Zeldin, a Trump ally with limited environmental experience, is poised to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, where he’s expected to champion aggressive deregulation of climate protections.
In short:
- Former Congressman Lee Zeldin of New York, nominated to lead the EPA, faces scrutiny over his qualifications and alignment with Trump’s plans to weaken climate regulations.
- Despite touting support for clean air and water, Zeldin has a record of opposing key environmental legislation, including the Inflation Reduction Act and air and water protections.
- Critics, including Senator Edward Markey, question whether Zeldin prioritizes safeguarding public health and the environment over political loyalty to Trump.
Key quote:
“My questions go to what the EPA priorities would be under his leadership.”
— Senator Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts Democrat
Why this matters:
For Trump, Zeldin seems to be the perfect ally to turbocharge the rollback of climate rules and possibly even shrink the EPA’s scope altogether. If confirmed, Zeldin’s tenure could mark a pivotal moment for the EPA — one where public health and climate priorities are left hanging in the balance. Will Zeldin’s loyalty lie with the environment or his political benefactor?
Read more: Donald Trump wins US presidency. What that could mean for the environment
California pulls back on zero-emission truck and train enforcement requests
California has withdrawn its requests to enforce stricter pollution rules on trucks and locomotives, anticipating resistance from the incoming Trump administration.
Mike Lee, Alex Nieves and Blanca Begert report for POLITICO.
In short:
- The state rescinded requests for EPA waivers to implement rules mandating zero-emission trucks and reduced diesel emissions from locomotives.
- The decision follows President-elect Trump’s vow to dismantle California’s environmental regulations and ongoing lawsuits from industry groups.
- California officials expressed disappointment but emphasized ongoing efforts to improve air quality despite federal challenges.
Key quote:
"Withdrawal is an important step given the uncertainty presented by the incoming administration that previously attacked California’s programs to protect public health and the climate."
— Liane Randolph, California Air Resources Board Chair
Why this matters:
California’s clean air policies often set the precedent for national environmental standards. Delays or rollbacks in state regulations could slow progress on public health improvements, with consequences for pollution-heavy regions and vulnerable populations.
Related: California faces fresh battle over environmental policies as Trump returns to office
Los Angeles wildfires intensified by effects of climate pollution, study finds
A UCLA analysis suggests Los Angeles’ recent wildfires burned hotter and spread faster due to fossil fuel-driven climate change, which contributed to drier conditions and more fuel for the flames.
In short:
- The study attributes 25% of available fire fuel to climate change, though it notes the fires likely would have happened regardless.
- Southern California saw two unusually wet winters followed by a dry summer and fall, creating abundant vegetation that dried out and became fuel.
- The fires were also fueled by a rare, strong Santa Ana wind event, though researchers say these winds are not clearly linked to global warming.
Why this matters:
As climate change fuels more severe weather patterns, extreme wildfires may become harder to control, posing risks to homes and communities across fire-prone regions.
Related:
Climate-driven heat waves and pollution imperil health in Global South
Record global heat in 2024 fueled longer heat waves, worsening air quality and public health in regions from India to Nigeria to Brazil, where extreme weather compounded pollution and respiratory disease risks.
Simrin Sirur reports for Mongabay with Orji Sunday and Karla Mendes.
In short:
- India faced record summer heat in 2024, intensifying air pollution in Delhi, with ozone levels above safe limits for 102 days.
- Wildfires in Brazil’s Amazon produced dangerous smoke that impacted Indigenous communities already vulnerable due to limited healthcare access.
- In Nigeria’s arid north, rising temperatures and dust storms fueled a meningitis surge, straining under-resourced hospitals.
Key quote:
“You can’t breathe properly anymore, you can’t sleep properly, you can’t see properly — that’s what I felt when we had the forest fires.”
— Takumã Kuikuro, filmmaker and president of the Alto Xingu Family Institute
Why this matters:
The Global South is experiencing deadly heat waves and pollution that disproportionately affect low-income communities, outdoor workers and vulnerable populations. As climate change accelerates, addressing the links between heat, air quality and disease is crucial for public health and environmental justice.