Trump administration accelerates logging in Black Hills, raising alarms over tribal rights and forest health

A sweeping federal directive to fast-track logging across most of the Black Hills has sparked outcry from Indigenous leaders, scientists, and environmental groups who say it threatens forest integrity, tribal sovereignty, and endangered species.

Anya Kamenetz reports for Grist.

In short:

A March 2025 executive order and an April U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) directive aim to expand logging in nearly 60% of the Black Hills National Forest, citing wildfire risk, while curtailing environmental review processes.
Critics argue the move undermines a 2023 federal-tribal agreement and ignores the ecological fragility of an already overcut forest that has yet to recover from past climate-related beetle infestations and fires.
Though the directive is framed as a timber production boost, data shows that large, marketable trees are increasingly scarce, making expanded logging both ecologically damaging and economically questionable.

Key quote:

“Our lifetime is shorter than the life of a forest. It’s spoken of as a renewable resource, but it’s such a long-term thing that in some ways, it’s not.”

— Mary Zimmerman of The Norbeck Society, a volunteer conservation group

Why this matters:

The Black Hills hold deep ecological and cultural significance. Long stewarded by Indigenous nations like the Lakota, who call the land Pahá Sápa, the forest is a living archive of centuries-old trees, wildlife habitats, and sacred sites. Fast-tracking industrial logging under the guise of wildfire prevention risks undoing decades of conservation and erasing tribal management practices rooted in ecological balance. While the Trump administration frames the policy as necessary for forest health and economic growth, many experts warn it prioritizes industry over sustainability, bypassing environmental oversight and violating prior commitments to tribal co-management.

grist.org

Trump administration accelerates logging in Black Hills, raising alarms over tribal rights and forest health

The next El Niño could lock earth into a hotter climate

A Michigan county claiming solar farms are a health threat isn’t alone

Toxics plus climate harms likely cause of reduced fertility, study finds

The 'age of electricity' is here. No one knows what comes next

As the UN global climate talks lose momentum, a smaller coalition eyes a fossil fuel exit

Republican lawmakers attempt to shield big oil from climate lawsuits in ‘alarming’ bills

‘Cut fossil fuel industry’s lifeline’: How subsidies and petrochemicals are propping up oil and gas

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.