Governments ramp up legal penalties to curb environmental protests

A growing number of countries are passing strict laws and imposing severe penalties on climate activists, escalating a global crackdown on nonviolent protests that target fossil fuel infrastructure.

Stuart Braun reports for Deutsche Welle.

In short:

In Australia, over 170 climate activists face possible jail time or steep fines after blocking a coal port, following enforcement of a 2022 anti-protest law targeting disruptions of public infrastructure.
Similar laws in the UK and Germany have led to prison sentences and criminal charges for environmental protesters, with experts linking these legal moves to fossil fuel industry interests.
In the U.S., a jury ordered Greenpeace to pay $660 million in damages for its role in pipeline protests, reflecting a rise in corporate lawsuits aimed at silencing climate dissent.

Key quote:

"You don't have to dig very deep. The protesters are being targeted because they are a threat to fossil fuel profits."

— Oscar Berglund, senior lecturer at the University of Bristol

Why this matters:

From Australia to Germany, laws once reserved for organized crime or terrorism are now being used to prosecute nonviolent protesters. Laws meant to preserve order increasingly serve to protect the fossil fuel industry, often at the expense of democratic freedoms. As more activists face criminal charges, fines, or even death, crackdowns on nonviolent protest may suppress voices that play a vital role in pushing governments and industries toward stronger action on climate change.

www.dw.com

Credit: Jesse Schoff/Unsplash

A new wildlife assessment shows alarming declines and a few bright spots

An update to the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, the global scientific authority on the status of species, underscores the immense challenges facing species in a world transformed by humans but also offer exciting new evidence of how the right interventions can help them survive.

Read the Full Article on

www.nytimes.com

Governments ramp up legal penalties to curb environmental protests

Researchers are reanimating 40,000-year-old microbes

A new wildlife assessment shows alarming declines and a few bright spots

'Not up for discussion': Brussels rejects Washington's pressure on climate rules

Senate nixes management plans to open access for fossil fuels

Inside Trump’s foray into mineral ownership

The hidden cost of ultra-processed foods on the environment: ‘The whole industry should pay’

This data scientist sees progress in the climate change fight

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.